|
Post by Nel on May 1, 2007 3:53:53 GMT -5
During the building of the site I'm going to need some input on a few things of which I am either unsure of or simply would like some feedback on. Anyone's help is most appreciated Currently my main concern for the site is picture copyright issues - I've seen so much trouble over at the Edie Sedgwick LJ community and want to completely avoid any sort of drama over that. Would anyone have any advice on how to do that? Right now I'm thinking a thorough disclaimer (i.e., 'Any and all photos are copyright their respective owners'), photo credits on any and all pages where they are used, that kind of thing.
|
|
|
Post by TheKiwi on May 14, 2007 13:26:18 GMT -5
Best way to do that would be with photo credits I think. I'm sure you'll be fine!
|
|
benfo
New Member
Posts: 39
|
Post by benfo on May 21, 2007 20:32:43 GMT -5
Stay away from Nat Finklesteins photos unless you have purchased them.
|
|
|
Post by Ally on May 21, 2007 22:06:38 GMT -5
Its to bad, the pictures Nat did were very beautiful and in color
|
|
benfo
New Member
Posts: 39
|
Post by benfo on May 21, 2007 22:34:53 GMT -5
Yeah, but hasnt he said horrible things about Edie?
|
|
|
Post by Nel on May 22, 2007 3:29:58 GMT -5
^ He has ("c*nt" is among them), and he's been so awful with fans online... one person had some videos on Youtube that I guess had some Finkelstein pics in them and he'd comment with apparently really gross, inappropriate threats. *sigh*
All in all I think it's silly to be so uptight about the pictures because if you see them online a lot it's good promotion, you know what I mean? I'd love to buy Nat Fink's Edie book because it has amazing pictures (and you know how I know? Because I've seen them online) but I don't want to support him. The small boycott Edie fans have against him is costing him money, really.
|
|
|
Post by ChildOfTheMoon on Jun 8, 2007 15:27:55 GMT -5
Including the credits seems to be the safest solution. I visited too many boards with empty spaces because of this problem. I know it's pain in the a**, especially since I have many pics I won't be able to upload because I dont remember the source. But it is the only way, I think.
|
|
|
Post by loonaka on Jun 11, 2007 4:14:15 GMT -5
^ He has ("c*nt" is among them), and he's been so awful with fans online... one person had some videos on Youtube that I guess had some Finkelstein pics in them and he'd comment with apparently really gross, inappropriate threats. *sigh* All in all I think it's silly to be so uptight about the pictures because if you see them online a lot it's good promotion, you know what I mean? I'd love to buy Nat Fink's Edie book because it has amazing pictures (and you know how I know? Because I've seen them online) but I don't want to support him. The small boycott Edie fans have against him is costing him money, really. What's wrong with him, why is he so mean, isn't he like oldish? why would he be so mean to Edie fans?? I don't get it. Anyway the book isn't that good, the pics have bad coloring and there aren't any new pics, if you know what i mean. Also why don't he like Edie?? I never got that...maybe i should ask him
|
|
|
Post by Nel on Jun 11, 2007 9:39:17 GMT -5
I don't think he "understands" her, plus he probably just wanted to generate some controversy, something that'll get him attention y'know. There's a perverse pleasure for people who have "met the stars" to denounce people's idols, it's silly and stupid.
|
|
|
Post by loonaka on Jun 12, 2007 6:37:21 GMT -5
yeah i know what you mean, thanks for explaining it for me
|
|